× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
tgomes39 tgomes39
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 608
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In United States v. Mead Corporation, where Mead sued Customs when it changed the classification of the planners Mead imported which resulted in Mead having to pay a 4 tariff, the Supreme Court held that:
 a. the change in classification was unjustified so Mead did not owe any tariffs b. the case should be thrown out for lack of evidence
  c. all rulings by Customs are equivalent to federal law so Mead had no case d. Mead should pay a 2 tariff as a compromise
  e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 64 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sammyxxsammyxx
wrote...
#1
Posts: 414
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tgomes39 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Brilliant ツ
AlahuKakpar
wrote...

Yesterday
Good timing, thanks!
smdavis
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  517 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 751
  
 1062
  
 286
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?