× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
tnvalerio tnvalerio
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 633
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hearts Bluff Game Ranch v. U.S., Hearts purchased a large piece of land that the Army Corps said could be used as mitigation property for wetlands purposes. Later, the state of Texas announced it was building a water reservoir that would put Hearts under water, so it could no longer be used for wetlands mitigation. Hearts sued for uncompensated taking as the property was more valuable for mitigation than under a reservoir. The appeals court held that the state of Texas would have to pay the value of the land as wetlands mitigation property when it bought it for use as a reservoir.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 87 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
sweetpeajezzysweetpeajezzy
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1115
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

tnvalerio Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This site is awesome
cipcal
wrote...

Yesterday
Brilliant ツ
Cdfields
wrote...

2 hours ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1280 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 779
  
 52
  
 582