× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
ac22888 ac22888
wrote...
Posts: 328
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hearts Bluff Game Ranch v. U.S., Hearts purchased a large piece of land that the Army Corps said could be used as mitigation property for wetlands purposes. Later, the state of Texas announced it was building a water reservoir that would put Hearts under water, so it could no longer be used for wetlands mitigation. Hearts sued for uncompensated taking as the property was more valuable for mitigation than under a reservoir. The appeals court held that no compensation was due as Hearts was never granted a right that could be enforced.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Read 96 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
breohbreoh
wrote...
Posts: 449
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

ac22888 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

Yesterday
Helped a lot
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1251 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 3535
  
 291
  
 878
Your Opinion
Which of the following is the best resource to supplement your studies:
Votes: 292

Previous poll results: Where do you get your textbooks?