In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel Comm., where a radio station company sued the largest firm ...

False

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel Comm., where a radio station company sued the largest firm in the industry for monopolization, the court found no evidence of illegal monopolistic activity by the large firm.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

True

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel Comm., where a radio station company sued the largest firm in the industry for monopolization, the court found that the large company illegally exploited its position to suppress competition.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

False

Still concerned about the others, I hope you can take a look at them

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel, where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish- language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting, a large Spanish-language radio chain, the court held that the:
 a. SB did had a case because they could show that CC and HBC's conduct had an anticompetitive effect on the entire market
  b. CC and HBC were liable for damages treble damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB
  c. CC and HBC were in violation of the Clayton Act and must face criminal charges
  d. CC and HBC were not in violation of any antitrust law, but they were still liable for damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB
  e. none of the other choices are correct

e

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel, where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish- language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting, a large Spanish-language radio chain, the court held that the:
 a. SB did had a case because they could show that CC and HBC's conduct had an anticompetitive effect on the entire market
  b. SB did not have a case because they could not show that CC and HBC's conduct had an anticompetitive effect on the entire market
  c. CC and HBC were in violation of the Clayton Act and must face criminal charges
  d. CC and HBC were not in violation of any antitrust law, but they were still liable for damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB
  e. CC and HBC were liable for damages treble damages due to their unreasonable conduct towards SB

b

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel, where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish- language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting, a large Spanish-language radio chain, the court held that the:
 a. case failed because Spanish could not show evidence of anticompetitive conduct
  b. two companies acted in concert to try to damage Spanish's market position, thereby violating the ShermanAct
 c. two companies controlled a dominant share of the market and used their power to reduce the ability ofSpanish to obtain sponsors, thereby violating the Sherman Act
 d. relationship was monopolization and Clear had to sell its interest in Hispanic e. none of the other choices

a

In Spanish Broadcasting v. Clear Channel, where Spanish sued Clear for monopolization of the Spanish- language radio market because it owned a share of Hispanic Broadcasting, a large Spanish-language radio chain, the court held that the:
 a. link between Clear and Hispanic was an interlocking directorate violating the Clayton Act
  b. two companies acted in concert to try to damage Spanish's market position, thereby violating the ShermanAct
 c. two companies controlled a dominant share of the market and used their power to reduce the ability ofSpanish to obtain sponsors, thereby violating the Sherman Act
 d. relationship was monopolization and Clear had to sell its interest in Hispanic e. none of the other choices