× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
4
h
4
h
4
m
3
d
3
B
3
o
3
w
3
H
3
a
3
c
3
k
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
madmadmad madmadmad
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 615
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
17-year-old Robert purchased a car from King that was then destroyed by fire. Robert sued to recover the price of the car. The court would hold that:
 a. no contract existed; Robert relied on King to his detriment
  b. no contract existed because Robert is too young to enter into a contract; his parents are parties to the contract
  c. a contract existed, but Robert was a minor and so could disaffirm the contract and get a full refund
  d. a contract existed, but the uneven bargaining positions of the parties allowed the court to render the contract void as in violation of public policy
  e. a contract existed that Robert could disaffirm, but he could only collect a refund equal to the value of the car after the fire
Read 66 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
vbassvbass
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1133
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

madmadmad Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
Zacellison
wrote...

Yesterday
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
fgarza2146
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1418 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 74
  
 307
  
 372
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 303
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?