× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
4
h
4
h
4
m
3
d
3
B
3
o
3
w
3
H
3
a
3
c
3
k
3
New Topic  
madmadmad madmadmad
wrote...
Posts: 615
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
17-year-old Robert purchased a car from King that was then destroyed by fire. Robert sued to recover the price of the car. The court would hold that:
 a. no contract existed; Robert relied on King to his detriment
  b. no contract existed because Robert is too young to enter into a contract; his parents are parties to the contract
  c. a contract existed, but Robert was a minor and so could disaffirm the contract and get a full refund
  d. a contract existed, but the uneven bargaining positions of the parties allowed the court to render the contract void as in violation of public policy
  e. a contract existed that Robert could disaffirm, but he could only collect a refund equal to the value of the car after the fire
Read 65 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
vbassvbass
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1133
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

madmadmad Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1426 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1025
  
 179
  
 688
Your Opinion
What's your favorite coffee beverage?
Votes: 303