× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
r
3
e
3
New Topic  
Beezus Beezus
wrote...
Posts: 339
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Explain how a trial court operates. How does a trial court differ from an appellate court?
 
  ?

Q. 2

Describe the federal court system.
 
  ?

Q. 3

Define subject-matter jurisdiction. Define personal jurisdiction. What is a long arm statute? What is the difference between original and appellate jurisdiction?
 
  ?

Q. 4

Define jurisdiction. Define venue. What is the difference between venue and jurisdiction? What is the relationship between state and federal jurisdiction?
 
  Ans?

Q. 5

The Internet's existence outside of political boundaries adds new complications to the issue of:
 
  a. Personal jurisdiction
  b. Original jurisdiction
  c. Appellate jurisdiction
  d. Federal-question jurisdiction
Read 62 times
3 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
(Answer to #1)  A trial court is presided over by a judge, who issues a decision on the matter before the court. If the trial is a jury trial (many trials are held without juries), the jury will decide the outcome of factual disputes, and the judge will issue a judgment based on the jury's conclusion. During the trial, the attorney for each side introduces evidence (such as relevant documents, exhibits, and testimony of witnesses) in support of the client's position. Each attorney is given an opportunity to cross- examine witnesses for the opposing party and challenge evidence introduced by the opposing party.
The functions of a trial court differ from the functions of an appellate court, because appellate courts review cases decided by trial courts. Usually, appellate courts do not look at questions of fact but at questions of law. Only a judge, not a jury, can rule on questions of law. Appellate courts normally defer to a trial court's findings on questions of fact because the trial court judge and jury were in a better position to evaluate testimony by directly observing witnesses' gestures, demeanor, and nonverbal behavior during the trial. When a case is appealed, an appellate panel of three or more judges reviews the record (including the written transcript of the trial) of the case on appeal, and the record does not include these nonverbal elements. Generally, then, appellate courts look for errors of law rather than evaluating the trial court judge's or jury's conclusions on questions of fact.

(Answer to #2)  The federal court system is basically a three-tiered model consisting of:
U.S. district courts (trial courts of general jurisdiction) and various courts of limited jurisdiction.
U.S. courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals).
The United States Supreme Court, located in Washington, D.C.

The federal district court is the trial court of general jurisdiction at the federal level. There is at least one federal district court in every state. Currently, there are ninety- four judicial districts. U.S. district courts have original jurisdiction in matters of federal law. Federal cases typically originate in district courts. There are other trial courts with original but special (or limited) jurisdiction, such as the federal bankruptcy courts and others.
A party who is dissatisfied with a federal district court's decision on an issue may appeal that decision to a federal circuit court of appeals. In the federal court system, there are thirteen U.S. courts of appeals, also referred to as U.S. circuit courts of appeals. The federal courts of appeals for twelve of the circuits (including the District of Columbia Circuit) hear appeals from the federal district courts located within their respective judicial circuits. The court of appeals for the thirteenth circuit, called the Federal Circuit, has national appellate jurisdiction over certain types of cases, such as cases involving patent law and cases in which the U.S. government is a defendant.
The highest level of the three-tiered model of the federal court system is the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court consists of nine justices. Although the Supreme Court has original, or trial, jurisdiction in rare instances, most of its work is as an appeals court. The Supreme Court can review any case decided by any of the federal courts of appeals, and it also has appellate authority over some cases decided in the state courts. There is no absolute right of appeal to the United States Supreme Court. To bring a case before the Supreme Court, a party requests the Court to issue a writ of certiorari, an order issued by the Supreme Court to a lower court requiring the lower court to send it the record of the case for review.

(Answer to #3)  Subject-matter jurisdiction is the court's authority to hear certain types of disputes. Personal jurisdiction is the court's authority to hear and decide a specific case against the parties involved, generally residents of a certain geographic area. A long arm statute is a statute that permits a state to obtain personal jurisdiction over nonresidents. The nonresidents must have certain minimum contacts with that state for the statute to apply.
Original jurisdiction is the power of a court to take a case, try it, and decide it. Appellate jurisdiction is the power of the court to hear and decide an appeal; that is, the power and authority of a court to review cases that already have been tried in a lower court. The difference between original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction is that courts with original jurisdiction are trial courts where evidence is presented (i.e., they hear the case for the first time). Courts with appellate jurisdiction are the
reviewing courts, or appellate courts, that review the decisions of the trial courts and make subsequent decisions in the case.

(Answer to #4)  Jurisdiction is the authority of the court to hear and decide a specific action. Jurisdiction is important because without it, a court cannot hear a case. Venue is the geographical district in which an action is tried and from which the jury is selected. Thus, venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for a trial. For example, two state courts may have the authority to exercise jurisdiction over a case, but it may be more appropriate or convenient to hear the case in one court than in the other. The difference between venue and jurisdiction is that jurisdiction has to do with whether a court has the authority to hear a case, while venue is concerned with the most appropriate location for a trial.
The relationship between state and federal jurisdiction may be one of either concurrent jurisdiction or exclusive jurisdiction. When both federal and state courts have the power to hear a case, as is true in suits involving diversity of citizenship, concurrent jurisdiction exists. When cases can be tried only in federal courts or only in state courts, exclusive jurisdiction exists. State courts have exclusive jurisdiction over all matters that are not subject to federal jurisdiction, such as family law and probate law.

(Answer to #5)  A
Beezus Author
wrote...
6 years ago
TY
wrote...
6 years ago
My pleasure
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1138 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 899
  
 728
  
 322
Your Opinion