× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
n
3
j
3
x
2
c
2
2
p
2
n
2
3
2
C
2
z
2
k
2
d
2
New Topic  
aaafgdfgf aaafgdfgf
wrote...
Posts: 362
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
When lawyers for Dan White, murderer of two San Francisco government officials, argued that his behavior was partially due to a diet of junk food, which legal concept was being used?
 
  a. involuntary commitment
 b. incompetence to stand trial
  c. diminished capacity
 d. least restrictive environment

Question 2

An attorney says to his client, If we can convince the judge that when you shot your mother, you either did not know it was a criminal thing to do or could not control your behavior because you had a mental disease or defect (other than antisocial conduct), you should be found not guilty by reason of insanity. What legal standard is the attorney describing?
 
  a. Durham standard
 b. American Law Institute Model Penal Code
  c. M'Naghten Rule
 d. irresistible impulse standard

Question 3

The Durham (1954) decision suggested that insanity was ____.
 
  a. an improper way for defendants to avoid responsibility
 b. too frequently successful, particularly in violent crimes
 c. always based on irresistible impulse
 d. a product of mental disease or defect as defined by mental health professionals
Read 168 times
2 Replies

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
Answer to #1

c

Answer to #2

b

Answer to #3

d
aaafgdfgf Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Thank you for answering correctly!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  873 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 259
  
 167
  
 735