Top Posters
Since Sunday
p
20
17
C
11
9
8
r
8
m
8
d
7
e
7
d
7
C
7
l
6
New Topic  
wrote...
Posts: 215
A month ago
In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled in 2 cases, Gratz v Bollinger and Grutter v Bollinger that:

▸ Only gender and age could be used for preferential admission.

▸ Preference could not be based on race or ethnicity.

▸ Promoting racial diversity in educational settings was legitimate.

▸ Gender could not be used as admission criteria.
Textbook 

Social Welfare: A History of the American Response to Need


Edition: 9th
Authors:
Read 47 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
wrote...
Posts: 236
A month ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything.
Promoting racial diversity in educational settings was legitimate.
1

Related Topics

wrote...
A month ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers.
Learn More
Improve Grades
Help Others
Save Time
Accessible 24/7
  189 People Browsing
 139 Signed Up Today
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 162

Related Images
 3506
 532
 432