Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
sportylatina sportylatina
wrote...
Posts: 103
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Gregory went to Collegiate Sports Ltd. with his dad, who asked for some shoes for Gregory suitable for playing squash. Gregory was given a pair of running shoes suitable only for jogging. His dad paid by cash. That evening, wearing the new shoes while playing squash, Gregory broke his ankle. In the ensuing lawsuit, the statement of claim cited the provisions of the Sale of Goods Act. Which of the following is true if it were proven that the shoes were inappropriate and the cause of the injury?

▸ Gregory's father would be the proper plaintiff in this action and could win on the claim that the goods were not fit for purpose.

▸ This is not a sale of goods situation because Gregory's father paid by cash.

▸ Only Gregory can sue since he was the only one hurt.

▸ This is a "buyer beware" situation and there would be no remedy for anyone.

▸ Gregory's father could win for breach of contract because he made known the purpose for which he wanted the shoes to a shoe dealer.
Textbook 
Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business

Legal Fundamentals for Canadian Business


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 169 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
blabla123blabla123
wrote...
Posts: 78
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

sportylatina Author
wrote...

2 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
wrote...

Yesterday
You make an excellent tutor!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1229 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 316
  
 287
  
 286
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 741