Top Posters
Since Sunday
k
1
1
1
1
1
o
1
New Topic  
jccruz jccruz
wrote...
Posts: 151
Rep: 0 0
6 months ago

The 100th game of chess gives Jones more utility than the 32nd game of chess. It follows that



neither the law or principle of diminishing marginal utility holds.



the law of diminishing marginal utility may hold since the 32nd game of chess might have been a different "good" than the 100th game of chess (after all, it could have been played with a different person).



there must be a law of increasing marginal utility.



total utility after the 32nd game had to be higher than total utility after the 100th game.



none of the above

Textbook 
Economics

Economics


Edition: 12th
Author:
Read 26 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
bodie1980bodie1980
wrote...
Posts: 166
Rep: 1 0
6 months ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

jccruz Author
wrote...

6 months ago
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  897 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 4432
  
 216
  
 262
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 329