Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
New Topic  
BritishGent BritishGent
wrote...
Posts: 1205
6 years ago
An article in a psychological journal reported, "The reliability of the personality ratings was .55.  The reliability of the supervisor's ratings on the job was .48.  Personality ratings correlated with the measure of job success to the extent of .65."  Why should you automatically suspect that there was an error in the report?
A) The correlation between two tests cannot be higher than the reliability of the more reliable test.
B) A personality rating could not be more reliable than a measure of job success.
C) It would be very rare to obtain a validity coefficient this high.
D) The correlation clearly has not been corrected for attenuation.
E) It would be unusual to have the reliability of ratings be this low.
Read 63 times
2 Replies
Using the textbooks:

Statistics for Psychology, 5th Edition (Aron)
Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, 8th Edition (Thorndike)
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
aeLiaLaeLiaL
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 828
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

BritishGent Author
wrote...
6 years ago
 I am very glad that i decided to get help from here
Using the textbooks:

Statistics for Psychology, 5th Edition (Aron)
Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, 8th Edition (Thorndike)
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1425 People Browsing
 105 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 4428
  
 323
  
 1349