Top Posters
Since Sunday
L
4
d
4
3
k
3
k
3
j
3
k
3
b
3
f
3
b
3
d
3
h
3
New Topic  
hannus hannus
wrote...
Posts: 755
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In a study conducted by Zimbardo and colleagues, participants were directed to decide how much shock to administer to another ‘subject’ in the study. Participants either wore hoods that obscured their face or remained uncovered. Researchers found that:
a. participants who were not wearing hoods would have administered four times as much shock as those wearing hoods.
b. participants who wore hoods would have administered twice as much shock as those who were not wearing hoods.
c. participants who were not wearing hoods would have administered twice as much shock as those who were wearing hoods.
d. participants with and without hoods would have administered the same level of shock.
Textbook 
THINK Social Psychology, Canadian Edition

THINK Social Psychology, Canadian Edition


Edition: 1st
Authors:
Read 143 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
ZexionZexion
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 516
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

hannus Author
wrote...
6 years ago
Thanks for answering so quickly
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1053 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1023
  
 603
  
 1679
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436