Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
f
3
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
bigcaat bigcaat
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 640
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Albert has agreed to sell his car to Larry for $14 000.00. Albert told Larry that the car had never been in an accident, was in good condition, and drove like a dream. Albert knew that this was untrue, but wanted to get as much money as he could for the car. In fact, the car had been in two accidents, had substantial frame damage, and could not be driven safely on the road. Assume that Harry had no way of checking on the condition of the car and that the principle of caveat emptor does not apply. In this situation, Albert's statement about the car is
a. a negligent misrepresentation.
b. an innocent misrepresentation.
c. a fraudulent misrepresentation.
d. a mere invitation to treat.
e. none of the above
Textbook 
The Law and Business Administration in Canada

The Law and Business Administration in Canada


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 58 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
AlexStanfordAlexStanford
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 734
Rep: 24 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

bigcaat Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
avance37
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
jmelchor77
wrote...

2 hours ago
Good timing, thanks!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  981 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 683
  
 602
  
 4436
Your Opinion
What's your favorite funny biology word?
Votes: 334
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?