× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business Economics
New Topic  
pirex pirex
wrote...
Posts: 634
Rep: 13 1
6 years ago
Non-neutral technological change is more valuable to labor than neutral technological change.
True or False? Provide an explanation.
Textbook 
Microeconomics

Microeconomics


Edition: 6th
Author:
Read 70 times
1 Reply
And if you call, I will answer
And if you fall, I'll pick you up
And if you court this disaster
I'll point you home

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
True ... Because Neutral technological change leaves the proportion in which inputs are used (for example, the labor/capital ratio) unchanged, but non-neutral technological changes are innovations that alter the labor/capital ratio. The labor/capital ratio used to produce a given level of output falls after non-neutral technological change. Therefore, non-neutral technological change is more valuable to labor than neutral technological change.
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1284 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 254
  
 859
  
 1657