× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
5
R
5
e
4
4
d
4
o
3
p
3
t
3
3
m
3
p
3
m
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Human Resources Communication Studies
New Topic  
alanis.rojas alanis.rojas
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 564
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Suppose a state passed a statute prohibiting corporations from buying ads to support or oppose any referendum unless the ballot measure relates directly to the corporation's business. This law most likely would be
 
  a. constitutional, because corporations don't have a First Amendment right to influence ballot measures.
  b. constitutional, under the shareholder rule of Buckley v. Valeo.
  c. unconstitutional, unless limited to nonprofit ideological corporations.
  d. unconstitutional, under the precedent of First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.
Read 37 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
JazzyjayJazzyjay
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1656
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

alanis.rojas Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
DragonHeart
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
nicolepope23
wrote...

2 hours ago
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  992 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 424
  
 869
  
 146
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 432
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?