× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
New Topic  
alanis.rojas alanis.rojas
wrote...
Posts: 564
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Suppose a state passed a statute prohibiting corporations from buying ads to support or oppose any referendum unless the ballot measure relates directly to the corporation's business. This law most likely would be
 
  a. constitutional, because corporations don't have a First Amendment right to influence ballot measures.
  b. constitutional, under the shareholder rule of Buckley v. Valeo.
  c. unconstitutional, unless limited to nonprofit ideological corporations.
  d. unconstitutional, under the precedent of First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti.
Read 35 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
JazzyjayJazzyjay
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1656
Rep: 5 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

alanis.rojas Author
wrote...

6 years ago
this is exactly what I needed
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Correct Slight Smile TY
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1286 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 328
  
 2339
  
 798
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?