× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
e
4
h
4
h
4
m
3
d
3
B
3
o
3
w
3
H
3
a
3
c
3
k
3
New Topic  
emmaflott emmaflott
wrote...
Posts: 603
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In 2003 the Supreme Court clarified the decision cited in the previous question by holding that cross-burning is not protected by the First Amendment if it can be shown that it was intended to intimidate anyone. The 2003 case:
 
  a) R.A.V. v. St. Paul; b) Virginia v. Black; c) Wisconsin v. Mitchell; d) Scheidler v. National Organization for Women; e) Ward v. Rock Against Racism.
Read 48 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
RosegrayyyyRosegrayyyy
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1663
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

emmaflott Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
wrote...

Yesterday
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
wrote...

2 hours ago
You make an excellent tutor!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1030 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 296
  
 397
  
 131
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 45
Closes: November 4

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?