× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
s
3
v
3
p
3
m
2
s
2
d
2
N
2
d
2
e
2
s
2
s
2
e
2
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Human Resources Communication Studies
New Topic  
emmaflott emmaflott
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 603
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In 2003 the Supreme Court clarified the decision cited in the previous question by holding that cross-burning is not protected by the First Amendment if it can be shown that it was intended to intimidate anyone. The 2003 case:
 
  a) R.A.V. v. St. Paul; b) Virginia v. Black; c) Wisconsin v. Mitchell; d) Scheidler v. National Organization for Women; e) Ward v. Rock Against Racism.
Read 50 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
RosegrayyyyRosegrayyyy
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1663
Rep: 3 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

emmaflott Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Good timing, thanks!
Ctownsend
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
jbarnett14
wrote...

2 hours ago
You make an excellent tutor!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1321 People Browsing
 105 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 134
  
 413
  
 319
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 559
Previous poll results: Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?