× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
Mimicri Mimicri
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 602
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Whalen v. Union Bag & Paper Co, where a paper mill polluted a farmer's creek so he sued to stop the pollution, the appeals court held that:
 a. the plaintiff did not have any rights with regard to the water flowing through his property
  b. the fact that the damage to the plaintiff was slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition was a good reason for refusing an injunction
  c. since the damage to the plaintiff was slight, there was no case
  d. since the damage to the plaintiff was slight, so the defendant should not have to pay damages e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 48 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
boopboop
wrote...
#1
Posts: 203
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

Mimicri Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
smi3
wrote...

Yesterday
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
joyceess
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1296 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 376
  
 1024
  
 622