× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
huck4 huck4
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 644
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Whalen v. Union Bag & Paper Co, where a paper mill polluted a farmer's creek so he sued to stop the pollution, the appeals court held that:
 a. the fact that the damage to the plaintiff was slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition was not a good reason for refusing an injunction
  b. the fact that the damage to the plaintiff was slight compared with the defendant's expense of abating the condition was a good reason for refusing an injunction
  c. since the damage to the plaintiff was slight, there was no case
  d. since the damage to the plaintiff was slight, so the defendant should not have to pay damages e. the plaintiff did not have any rights with regard to the water flowing through his property
Read 46 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
zoechunnzoechunn
wrote...
#1
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

huck4 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
fgarza2146
wrote...

Yesterday
this is exactly what I needed
Marcie D
wrote...

2 hours ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1294 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 874
  
 992
  
 1024