× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
a
3
r
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business
New Topic  
helpmepleaseee helpmepleaseee
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 535
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Wickard v. Filburn concerned the ability of Congress to impose controls on wheat growing, including a small farm that produced a small amount of wheat for use on the farm. The Supreme Court held that the controls were:
 a. constitutional; while one farmer made no difference, all small farmers together could impact the wheat market
  b. unconstitutional since such a small amount was insufficient commerce, but the regulations could be written to apply to all active sellers in the wheat market
  c. unconstitutional since all of the wheat was sold or used within the state
  d. unconstitutional since none of the wheat was sold; all wheat was used on the farm e. constitutional only to wheat actually sold in interstate commerce
Read 39 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Trejo1426Trejo1426
wrote...
#1
Posts: 230
Rep: 1 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

helpmepleaseee Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
SlimyPencil
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
rhockeygirl
wrote...

2 hours ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1545 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 271
  
 122
  
 856
Your Opinion
Do you believe in global warming?
Votes: 488
Previous poll results: What's your favorite funny biology word?