× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
y
2
m
2
m
2
u
2
m
2
B
2
M
2
e
2
k
2
N
2
y
2
m
2
New Topic  
hongocbaotram hongocbaotram
wrote...
Posts: 724
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago

The CEO of the new green energy firm that recently moved into town gave a talk at the Town
  Hall meeting where he argued that building green will actually save the city money in the long
  run. Yet, this cant be true. After all, hes just going to say what is in his companys best interest,
  isnt he?


 
  What will be an ideal response?
Read 69 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago

ANS:This
passage contains an argument. The issue is whether building green will actually save
the city money in the long run. The conclusion is that building green will not actually save the
city money in the long run. The first premise is that the CEO of the new green energy firm that
recently moved into town argued that building green will actually save the city money in the long
run. The second premise is that the CEO of the new green energy company is just saying what is
in his company's best interest.
This argument commits the ad hominem fallacy because the arguer attacks the source of
the argument, not the argument itself.

New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  477 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 31
  
 378
  
 326
Your Opinion
How often do you eat-out per week?
Votes: 81

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?