× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
ade_tpy99 ade_tpy99
wrote...
Posts: 675
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
The Supreme Court in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne (2009) involved prisoner Osborne's postconviction request to compel officials to release biological evidence so it could be submitted to DNA testing. What was the finding of the Court?
 
  a. Osborne has a right under the U.S. Constitution of access to forensic evidence
  b. Osborne's rights under Alaska law were violated
  c. there is no right under the U.S. Constitution of access to forensic evidence
  d. DNA testing is too expensive to make it a constitutional right
Read 48 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
6 years ago
c
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1396 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 901
  
 297
  
 303
Your Opinion
Which is the best fuel for late night cramming?
Votes: 145

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?