× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
  
  
Top Posters
Since Sunday
r
6
u
5
b
4
r
4
o
4
d
4
n
4
l
4
V
3
3
m
3
s
3
New Topic  
nyounger nyounger
wrote...
Posts: 494
3 years ago
Joe pre-orders a non-refundable movie ticket. He then reads a number of reviews of the movie in question that make him realize that he will not enjoy it. He goes to see it anyway, rationalizing that otherwise his money will have been wasted.  Is Joe succumbing to the Sunk Cost Fallacy, and why?

▸ No, because the cost of the movie was not recoverable and would have been lost whatever action he took.

▸ No, because he incurred no further costs by going to see the movie.

▸ Yes, since he invested a valuable asset, his time, in a project based on its previous costs.

▸ No, because going to see the movie means that the product of his initial investment was realized as originally planned.
Textbook 

Fundamentals of Corporate Finance


Edition: 2nd
Authors:
Read 96 times
1 Reply

Related Topics

Replies
wrote...
3 years ago
Yes, since he invested a valuable asset, his time, in a project based on its previous costs.
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  330 People Browsing
 315 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 4998
  
 1061
  
 261
Your Opinion
Which 'study break' activity do you find most distracting?
Votes: 456

Previous poll results: Who's your favorite biologist?