Top Posters
Since Sunday
j
4
m
4
n
3
m
3
R
3
V
3
e
3
w
3
j
3
a
3
a
3
h
3
New Topic  
merrisara merrisara
wrote...
Posts: 153
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Why does the expected stretching absorption of the C=O bond in compounds I and II differ, as shown below?




▸ Compound I has more possible resonance structures, increasing the single bond character of the carbonyl group.

▸ Compound II has more possible resonance structures, increasing the single bond character of the carbonyl group.

▸ Compound I has a C to O bond with more single bond character than that of compound II, increasing the expected stretching absorption of the bond.

▸ Only compound II has resonance, causing it to have a higher stretching absorption.

▸ Only compound I has resonance, causing it to have a higher stretching absorption.
Textbook 
Organic Chemistry

Organic Chemistry


Edition: 4th
Author:
Read 42 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
szsz
wrote...
Posts: 144
Rep: 0 0
2 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

merrisara Author
wrote...

2 years ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks for your help!!
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thanks
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  626 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 110
  
 215
  
 562
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 436