More of a statement ,
The hand is the perfect example of a divine architect.
There is no evolution involved.
in which I ask,
do you agree with it?
and second,
How can you not see a designer behind it? that the hand is created by God explains why the hand is so well designed and complex while evolution has nothing on the hand and why it is so complex. How can you not see a designer behind it?
Like what does evolution have that supports the hand being the wy they are?
More of a statement ,
The hand is the perfect example of a divine architect.
There is no evolution involved.
in which I ask,
do you agree with it?
and second,
How can you not see a designer behind it? that the hand is created by God explains why the hand is so well designed and complex while evolution has nothing on the hand and why it is so complex. How can you not see a designer behind it?
POST MERGE: 26 MINUTES AGO
Like what does evolution have that supports the hand being the wy they are?
Hi again, AlanTS
I don't understand either question.
Is the perfect example of a divine architect?
Is there is no evolution involved?
More of a statement ,
The hand is the perfect example of a divine architect.
There is no evolution involved.
in which I ask,
do you agree with it?
and second,
How can you not see a designer behind it? that the hand is created by God explains why the hand is so well designed and complex while evolution has nothing on the hand and why it is so complex. How can you not see a designer behind it?
Like what does evolution have that supports the hand being the wy they are?
Quick Reply
