× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
w
3
w
3
e
3
3
r
3
g
2
2
b
2
M
2
V
2
f
2
c
2
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Human Resources Communication Studies
New Topic  
billybob3 billybob3
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 602
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Hustler v. Falwell the Supreme Court limited claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from harsh parodies in the media by ruling that
 
  a. the plaintiff must prove that physical illness resulted.
  b. the defendant must have acted with the intent to cause emotional distress.
  c. public figures must show that the offensive communication alleged facts and was published with actual malice.
  d. there must be outrageous or highly offensive conduct, as judged by a reasonable person of average sensibilities.
Read 47 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
weissdweissd
wrote...
#1
Top Poster
Posts: 1666
Rep: 6 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

billybob3 Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
Roselalo
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
ezsancheezy
wrote...

2 hours ago
Thank you, thank you, thank you!
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  576 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 526
  
 418
  
 790
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 119
Closes: November 4
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?