× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
c
6
r
4
c
3
m
3
h
3
1
3
n
3
s
3
d
3
c
3
r
3
e
3
New Topic  
stfajar stfajar
wrote...
Posts: 354
6 years ago
In affirmative action cases involving the University of Michigan decided in 2003, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
 
  a. some preferential treatment in admitting undergraduate and law students was acceptable.
  b. any form of affirmative action violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
  c. racial quotas were permissible for as many years as discrimination had been practiced.
  d. preferences for children of alumni were unconstitutional.
  e. all forms of affirmative action were acceptable under the Constitution and the Civil Rights Act.
Read 58 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Victoria Q.Victoria Q.
wrote...
Posts: 221
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

stfajar Author
wrote...

6 years ago
You make an excellent tutor!
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1100 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 1983
  
 257
  
 1044
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 559

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?