× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
d
4
N
3
3
R
3
k
3
o
3
Z
3
j
3
s
3
d
3
J
3
1
3
New Topic  
deping deping
wrote...
Posts: 266
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In K.C. Roofing Center v. On Top Roofing, Inc, where K.C. Roofing asked the courts to hold Nugent, the owner of On Top Roofing, a corporation which no longer existed, personally liable for the cost of roofing supplies sold to On Top Roofing while it existed, the appeals court held that:
 a. Nugent was personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because he was using corporate status to avoid debts to the plaintiff
  b. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing was a limited liability company
  c. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing no longer existed d. Nugent was personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because K.C. Roofing Center was also alimited liability company
 e. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because the evidence did not support the three-part test for piercing the corporate veil
Read 61 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
derrickpate22derrickpate22
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1156
Rep: 7 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

deping Author
wrote...

6 years ago
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

Yesterday
This calls for a celebration Person Raising Both Hands in Celebration
wrote...

2 hours ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1423 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 461
  
 125
  
 275
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 119
Closes: November 4

Previous poll results: What's your favorite math subject?