× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
r
4
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
lexxis lexxis
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 630
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In K.C. Roofing Center v. On Top Roofing, Inc, where K.C. Roofing asked the courts to hold Nugent, the owner of On Top Roofing, a corporation which no longer existed, personally liable for the cost of roofing supplies sold to On Top Roofing while it existed, the appeals court held that:
 a. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because the evidence did not support the three-part test for piercing the corporate veil
  b. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing was a limited liability company
  c. Nugent was not personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because On Top Roofing no longer existed d. Nugent was personally liable for the debts owed the plaintiffs because K.C. Roofing Center was also alimited liability company
 e. none of the other choices are correct
Read 58 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Mmm23Mmm23
wrote...
#1
Posts: 220
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

lexxis Author
wrote...

6 years ago
This helped my grade so much Perfect
amandamraz
wrote...

Yesterday
Smart ... Thanks!
taydav
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1046 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 984
  
 1086
  
 367
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 3
Closes: November 4
Previous poll results: Should Ph.D.'s be addressed as doctors?