× Didn't find what you were looking for? Ask a question
Top Posters
Since Sunday
z
4
n
4
t
4
k
3
x
3
r
3
m
3
j
3
c
3
l
3
e
3
s
2
Home Q & A Board Humanities Legal Studies
New Topic  
deping deping
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 266
Rep: 0 0
6 years ago
In Erichsen v. No-Frills Supermarkets, a woman who was shopping was seriously injured by a robber in the parking lot. She sued the store claiming that its failure to provide adequate security was a breach of its duty to her. The Nebraska high court held that the store could:
 a. be sued because the assailant was a store employee
  b. be sued for strict liability for failure to protect a patron
  c. have been liable if the incident occurred in the store, but not out in the parking lot d. not be liable as the incident was a random, uncommon event
  e. none of these
Read 89 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
kadoddkadodd
wrote...
#1
Posts: 433
Rep: 2 0
6 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
1

Related Topics

deping Author
wrote...

6 years ago
Thanks
big_larry_samp
wrote...

Yesterday
Correct Slight Smile TY
dianeflunder
wrote...

2 hours ago
Helped a lot
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  493 People Browsing
Start New Topic Take the Tour CoursesNew Study Tools Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Live Chat
Related Images
  
 1564
  
 5250
  
 764
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 262
Previous poll results: What's your favorite funny biology word?