In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless ...

In U.S. v. White, involving incriminating statements heard by law enforcement because of warrantless electronic eavesdropping of defendant White's coconspirator, the Supreme Court held that:
 
  a. live participant monitoring was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, butelectronic eavesdropping was not.
 b. White had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his conversation with the co-conspirator.
  c. three-party bugging jeopardizes our sense of security and therefore was unreasonable.
  d. the use of government informants in the respondent's home violated the Fourth Amendment.