Top Posters
Since Sunday
5
a
5
k
5
c
5
B
5
l
5
C
4
s
4
a
4
t
4
i
4
r
4
New Topic  
elbthwtkns01 elbthwtkns01
wrote...
Posts: 435
Rep: 0 0
5 years ago

Rolando realizes that whenever he studies for at least two hours immediately before a physics exam, he gets an A on the exam, but when he does not study immediately before an exam, he gets no higher than a C on the exam. He concludes that the time spent studying immediately before the exams is responsible for his improved grades. Rolando is



▸ definitely confusing correlation with causation.

▸ very probably correct in his conclusion that the time spent studying immediately before his exams is a reason for his improved grades.

▸ likely correct that there is causation, but the causation is more likely running in the opposite direction in that the improved exam grades forced him to study immediately before each test.

▸ probably misguided in that there is no apparent correlation or causation in this situation.
Textbook 
Principles of Economics

Principles of Economics


Edition: 12th
Authors:
Read 166 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
Cass S.Cass S.
wrote...
Posts: 390
5 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

elbthwtkns01 Author
wrote...

5 years ago
Thanks
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
wrote...

2 hours ago
Just got PERFECT on my quiz
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1218 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 4491
  
 627
  
 100
Your Opinion
Who will win the 2024 president election?
Votes: 3
Closes: November 4

Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?