Top Posters
Since Sunday
18
s
5
C
4
j
4
s
4
W
3
a
3
H
3
s
3
a
3
o
3
K
3
Home Q & A Board Other Fields Homework Help Business Economics
New Topic  
youngbloodz youngbloodz
wrote...
Go to Answer
Posts: 75
Rep: 0 0
3 months ago
Wendy has to decide between taking a flight and driving to California. Air tickets cost $800 and will get her to California in 2 hours. If she decides to drive, she would need $300 worth of gasoline and 10 hours to reach her destination. Suppose Wendy's opportunity cost of time is $20 per hour.
a) Assuming that there are no other costs involved, use cost-benefit analysis to decide whether she should fly or drive to California.
b) If Wendy has an important business meeting to attend and this increases her opportunity cost of time to $200 per hour, will her optimum decision change? Explain.
Textbook 
Macroeconomics

Macroeconomics


Edition: 3rd
Authors:
Read 6 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
smiller94107smiller94107
wrote...
#1
Posts: 82
Rep: 0 0
3 months ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
a) Cost-benefit analysis is a calculation that adds up costs and benefits using a common unit of measurement. It is used to identify the alternative that has the greatest net benefit, which is equivalent to benefits minus costs. If Wendy decides to drive down instead of flying, she saves ($800 − $300) = $500. But driving down to California takes an additional 8 hours of travel time. Therefore, the net benefit of driving relative to flying is:
($500 Cost saving) − (8 hours Additional travel time) × ($20/hour) = $500 − $160 = $340. Because the net benefit of driving is positive, driving to California is the optimum choice for Wendy when the opportunity cost of time is $20 per hour.
b) If the opportunity cost of time changes, the net benefit of driving relative to flying will also change: Net benefit of driving relative to flying when the opportunity cost of time is $200 per hour = ($500 Cost saving) − (8 hours Additional travel time) × ($200/hour) = $500 − $1,600 = −$1,100.
Because the net benefit of driving relative to flying is negative, flying to California is the optimum choice for Wendy when the opportunity cost of time is $200 per hour.

This verified answer contains over 180 words.
1

Related Topics

youngbloodz Author
wrote...

3 months ago
Thanks
kc123
wrote...

Yesterday
I appreciate what you did here, answered it right Smiling Face with Open Mouth
asd454512
wrote...

2 hours ago
Brilliant ツ
New Topic      
Quick Reply
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  208 People Browsing
 309 Signed Up Today
Start New Topic Take the Tour Study Tips Study ToolsNew Topics Trending Browse by Textbook
Related Images
  
 207
  
 188
  
 109
Your Opinion
Which country would you like to visit for its food?
Votes: 126
Previous poll results: Do you believe in global warming?