Top Posters
Since Sunday
g
3
3
2
J
2
p
2
m
2
h
2
s
2
r
2
d
2
l
2
a
2
New Topic  
bromonox bromonox
wrote...
Posts: 1042
8 years ago
You live in a seismically active area and there are steep mountain slopes that show evidence of past large landslides.  A geologist uses radiocarbon dating and determines that all of the landslides are 1000 +/- 5 years old.  He also determines that there is an active fault in the area that moved in the last 1000-2000 years but he can't date it precisely.  Which of the following is a reasonable conclusion?
A) There was probably an earthquake ~1000 years ago.
B) There must have been a major drought 1000 years ago that triggered the landslides.
C) There must have been people in the area 1000 years ago, and they cut down the trees that were dated for determining the age of the landslide.
D) Radiocarbon dating is not a good dating technique or it could separate the ages of the slides.
Textbook 
Earth Science

Earth Science


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 482 times
2 Replies
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
PulsaPulsa
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 1845
8 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
miszkelly,  kaitlynkerb99@g

Related Topics

bromonox Author
wrote...
8 years ago
Perfect timing, thank you for the help!
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1087 People Browsing
 115 Signed Up Today
Related Images
  
 349
  
 2726
  
 3101
Your Opinion
What percentage of nature vs. nurture dictates human intelligence?
Votes: 431