Top Posters
Since Sunday
r
4
L
4
3
d
3
M
3
l
3
V
3
s
3
d
3
a
3
g
3
j
3
New Topic  
bigcaat bigcaat
wrote...
Posts: 640
Rep: 0 0
7 years ago
A orally agrees with B to lease an office in B's building for four years. A moves in and renovates the office and also pays monthly rent to B pursuant to their agreement. B now decides to arbitrarily tell A to leave because there is no lease. If A wants to make B specifically perform the lease, a court will most likely find that
a. the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, but A's acts will give him a quantum meruit claim for the renovations.
b. the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, but A's acts constitute part performance and the lease should be upheld.
c. the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, and A's acts do not amount to part performance so effectively there is no lease.
d. the lease is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds, but A's acts will give him a claim for unjust enrichment for the renovations.
e. all of the above
Textbook 
The Law and Business Administration in Canada

The Law and Business Administration in Canada


Edition: 14th
Authors:
Read 80 times
1 Reply
Replies
Answer verified by a subject expert
AlexStanfordAlexStanford
wrote...
Top Poster
Posts: 734
7 years ago
Sign in or Sign up in seconds to unlock everything for free
More solutions for this book are available here
1

Related Topics

bigcaat Author
wrote...

7 years ago
Brilliant
wrote...

Yesterday
Thanks
wrote...

2 hours ago
this is exactly what I needed
New Topic      
Explore
Post your homework questions and get free online help from our incredible volunteers
  1694 People Browsing
Related Images
  
 382
  
 165
  
 264
Your Opinion
What's your favorite math subject?
Votes: 559